Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs SJK

Jaro vs SJK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs SJK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
SJK SJK Away Team
Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

SJK
41.3
W D D L W L L L D D

Performance Radar

Jaro
SJK

Categories Won

3

Jaro

4

Draw

8

SJK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
O. Tessilimi (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

50.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 53.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

1.48

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

41.3

Attack: 46.8, Defense: 46.8, Form: 20.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

7
Jaro
SJK
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7
SJK

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.8
Defense 46.8
Form 20.0
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 53.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)
SJK logo SJK
W
TPS (41%)
D
Ilves (51%)
D
Inter Turku (61%)
L
VPS (58%)
W
Lahti (48%)
L
Gnistan (60%)
L
Oulu (49%)
L
Inter Turku (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
TPS H
3 - 1 W
41%
Ilves A
2 - 2 D
51%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
61%
VPS H
1 - 2 L
58%
Lahti A
3 - 2 W
48%
Gnistan A
2 - 3 L
60%
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
49%
Inter Turku H
1 - 3 L
56%
KuPS A
0 - 0 D
67%
Ilves H
1 - 1 D
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.7 vs 50.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Jaro averaging 1.1 and SJK averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Defensively, SJK is far superior, conceding just 1.6 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

SJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

SJK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
SJK

SJK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

SJK

2W 4D 4L · 14 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or