Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs SJK

Jaro vs SJK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs SJK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
SJK SJK Away Team
Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Last 10 Matches

SJK
39.9
L L D W L L L W D D

Performance Radar

Jaro
SJK

Categories Won

2

Jaro

6

Draw

7

SJK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Kelwin (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

47.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

39.9

Attack: 42.2, Defense: 48.7, Form: 19.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

4

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

4
Jaro
SJK
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2
SJK

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 42.2
Defense 48.7
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.1 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)
SJK logo SJK
L
Lahti (54%)
L
Mariehamn (34%)
D
Gnistan (54%)
W
HJK (55%)
L
Jaro (38%)
L
KuPS (43%)
L
VPS (55%)
W
TPS (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lahti H
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn A
0 - 2 L
34%
Gnistan H
2 - 2 D
54%
HJK H
3 - 0 W
55%
Jaro A
1 - 2 L
38%
KuPS H
0 - 2 L
43%
VPS A
0 - 1 L
55%
TPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Ilves A
2 - 2 D
49%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
58%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.1 vs 47.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

SJK holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Jaro's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, SJK holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Jaro's 2.0.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

SJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: SJK is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, SJK faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Jaro can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for SJK. In practical terms, SJK would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward SJK, with a 9.1-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-24), Jaro prevailed 2-1 against SJK. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Jaro secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. SJK will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Jaro will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
SJK

SJK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

SJK

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or