Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs TPS

Jaro vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Last 10 Matches

TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Performance Radar

Jaro
TPS

Categories Won

1

Jaro

4

Draw

10

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

2
4

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

76-90+'

3
Jaro
TPS
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.1 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.1 vs 45.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

TPS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to Jaro's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for TPS — 1.1 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of Jaro, who give up 2.0 goals per match at the other end.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TPS. In practical terms, TPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

TPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.6 vs 30.8) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-06-27), TPS prevailed 3-2 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or