Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs TPS

Jaro vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

TPS
39.7
L W D L L W L L W D

Performance Radar

Jaro
TPS

Categories Won

4

Jaro

5

Draw

6

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
A. Muzaci (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

47.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

0.94

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

39.7

Attack: 32.5, Defense: 55.2, Form: 29.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2

46-60'

4

61-75'

1

76-90+'

4
Jaro
TPS
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 32.5
Defense 55.2
Form 29.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 49.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)
TPS logo TPS
L
SJK (46%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Lahti (48%)
L
KuPS (62%)
L
Ilves (51%)
W
VPS (58%)
L
Inter Turku (61%)
L
Oulu (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
1 - 3 L
46%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
48%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
62%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
51%
VPS H
1 - 0 W
58%
Inter Turku A
1 - 2 L
61%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
54%
HJK H
1 - 0 W
49%
Jaro A
2 - 2 D
34%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.7 vs 47.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Jaro averaging 1.1 and TPS averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Defensively, TPS is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors TPS, who boasts a 75% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

TPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-06-27), TPS prevailed 3-2 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 2-2 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-05-02). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

TPS

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or