Skip to content
Compare Kazakhstan vs N. Macedonia

Kazakhstan vs N. Macedonia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kazakhstan vs N. Macedonia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Home Team
N. Macedonia N. Macedonia Away Team
Kazakhstan
42.9
L D W W L D D W L L

Last 10 Matches

N. Macedonia
33.8
L D D L L D D D W L

Performance Radar

Kazakhstan
N. Macedonia

Categories Won

8

Kazakhstan

4

Draw

3

N. Macedonia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-10

-10

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kenzhebek (2 goals)
E. Bardhi (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.7

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 62.0

55.8

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 65.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.21

0.75

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
42.9

Attack: 38.4, Defense: 55.8, Form: 31.4

33.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 10.6

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

2
Kazakhstan
N. Macedonia
Kazakhstan

Power Rating Breakdown

42.9

Overall

Attack 38.4
Defense 55.8
Form 31.4
Consistency 53.2
N. Macedonia

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 42.3
Form 10.6
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.5 vs 82.5

Opponent Quality

62.0 vs 65.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kazakhstan logo Kazakhstan
L
Hungary (72%)
D
Armenia (48%)
W
Comoros (58%)
W
Namibia (50%)
L
Faroe Islands (74%)
D
Belgium (79%)
D
N. Macedonia (57%)
W
Liechtenstein (38%)
N. Macedonia logo N. Macedonia
L
Turkey (78%)
D
Bosnia (64%)
D
Rep. Ireland (74%)
L
Denmark (81%)
L
Wales (66%)
D
Latvia (53%)
D
Kazakhstan (58%)
D
Belgium (84%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 3 L
72%
Armenia A
1 - 1 D
48%
Comoros H
1 - 0 W
58%
Namibia H
2 - 0 W
50%
Faroe Islands A
0 - 1 L
74%
Belgium H
1 - 1 D
79%
N. Macedonia A
1 - 1 D
57%
Liechtenstein H
4 - 0 W
38%
Belgium A
0 - 6 L
84%
Wales H
0 - 1 L
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Turkey A
0 - 4 L
78%
Bosnia A
0 - 0 D
64%
Rep. Ireland A
0 - 0 D
74%
Denmark A
0 - 4 L
81%
Wales A
1 - 7 L
66%
Latvia H
0 - 0 D
53%
Kazakhstan H
1 - 1 D
58%
Belgium A
0 - 0 D
84%
Liechtenstein H
5 - 0 W
38%
Saudi Arabia A
1 - 2 L
56%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 54.7 vs 55.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Kazakhstan holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus N. Macedonia's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Kazakhstan's backline outperforms N. Macedonia's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Kazakhstan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

N. Macedonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

❄️ Form Momentum: N. Macedonia is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Kazakhstan faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If N. Macedonia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Kazakhstan. In practical terms, Kazakhstan would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Kazakhstan has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.1-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-10-13). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan

VS
N. Macedonia

N. Macedonia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kazakhstan

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

N. Macedonia

1W 5D 4L · 8 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or