KFUM vs Fredrikstad Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KFUM vs Fredrikstad: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KFUM
Home Team
Fredrikstad
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KFUM
Draw
Fredrikstad
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
5W, 1D, 4L
10 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-4
-3
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2W / 7 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 51.7
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.11
Attack: 29.4, Defense: 47.0, Form: 26.4
Attack: 25.8, Defense: 51.6, Form: 43.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KFUM
Fredrikstad
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (38.1 vs 36.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and Fredrikstad averaging 0.9 goals per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.4 and Fredrikstad conceding 1.2 per match.
Fredrikstad has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.2 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Fredrikstad has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fredrikstad faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If KFUM can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: KFUM's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KFUM
Fredrikstad
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KFUM
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded
Fredrikstad
5W 1D 4L · 9 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams