Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Malta

KFUM vs Malta Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Malta: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Malta Malta Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Malta
36.1
W L L L L W L L W D

Performance Radar

KFUM
Malta

Categories Won

5

KFUM

4

Draw

6

Malta

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
P. Mbong (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

53.1

League Difficulty: 82.4, Opponent Quality: 57.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

1.19

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

36.1

Attack: 37.8, Defense: 34.4, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
KFUM
Malta
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Malta

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 37.8
Defense 34.4
Form 30.9
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 82.4

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 57.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Malta logo Malta
W
Azerbaijan (53%)
L
Slovakia (70%)
L
Luxembourg (55%)
L
Luxembourg (50%)
L
Poland (69%)
W
Finland (58%)
L
Bosnia (60%)
L
Netherlands (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Azerbaijan A
2 - 0 W
53%
Slovakia A
1 - 2 L
70%
Luxembourg A
0 - 3 L
55%
Luxembourg H
0 - 2 L
50%
Poland H
2 - 3 L
69%
Finland A
1 - 0 W
58%
Bosnia H
1 - 4 L
60%
Netherlands H
0 - 4 L
74%
San Marino H
3 - 1 W
34%
Lithuania A
1 - 1 D
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Malta has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Malta's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and Malta averaging 1.1 goals per match.

KFUM has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Malta's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Malta

Malta

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Malta

3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or