Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Pardubice

KFUM vs Pardubice Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Pardubice: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Pardubice Pardubice Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Pardubice
55.0
L W W W W W L W D L

Performance Radar

KFUM
Pardubice

Categories Won

2

KFUM

2

Draw

11

Pardubice

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
V. Patrák (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

53.2

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

1.48

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

55.0

Attack: 48.2, Defense: 61.9, Form: 61.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

3
KFUM
Pardubice
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Pardubice

Power Rating Breakdown

55.0

Overall

Attack 48.2
Defense 61.9
Form 61.9
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 50.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Pardubice logo Pardubice
L
Karviná (42%)
W
Karviná (47%)
W
Zlín (41%)
W
Plzeň (65%)
W
Olomouc (50%)
W
Dukla (48%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (63%)
W
Karviná (47%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karviná H
1 - 3 L
42%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
47%
Zlín H
3 - 1 W
41%
Plzeň A
1 - 0 W
65%
Olomouc H
2 - 1 W
50%
Dukla A
2 - 0 W
48%
Ml. Boleslav A
0 - 2 L
63%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
47%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Slovácko A
0 - 2 L
42%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Pardubice has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Pardubice's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Pardubice holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus KFUM's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Pardubice has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to KFUM's 1.7.

Pardubice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Pardubice is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Pardubice emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (55.0 vs 32.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Pardubice

Pardubice

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Pardubice

6W 1D 3L · 14 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or