Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Parma

KFUM vs Parma Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Parma: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Parma Parma Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Parma
42.0
W L L L W W D D L L

Performance Radar

KFUM
Parma

Categories Won

4

KFUM

3

Draw

8

Parma

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
N. Elphege (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

64.1

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 68.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

0.97

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

42.0

Attack: 30.4, Defense: 60.9, Form: 34.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

76-90+'

3
KFUM
Parma
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 30.4
Defense 60.9
Form 34.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 68.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 17%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Parma logo Parma
W
Sassuolo (60%)
L
Como (77%)
L
Roma (78%)
L
Inter Milan (88%)
W
Pisa (41%)
W
Udinese (71%)
D
Napoli (75%)
D
Lazio (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sassuolo H
1 - 0 W
60%
Como A
0 - 1 L
77%
Roma H
2 - 3 L
78%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
88%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
41%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
71%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
75%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
65%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
55%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
72%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Parma has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.1) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Parma's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and Parma averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Parma has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to KFUM's 1.7.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Parma has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Parma

Parma

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Parma

3W 2D 5L · 8 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or