Skip to content
Compare Kifisia vs De Graafschap

Kifisia vs De Graafschap Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kifisia vs De Graafschap: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kifisia Kifisia Home Team
De Graafschap De Graafschap Away Team
Kifisia
43.9
L D W D L W W D D D

Last 10 Matches

De Graafschap
46.1
W D L

Performance Radar

Kifisia
De Graafschap

Categories Won

5

Kifisia

2

Draw

8

De Graafschap

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

33%

1W, 1D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.3

7 / 3 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.3

7 / 3 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

0

0

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 3 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

100%

3 / 3 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

100%

3 / 3 matches

Top Scorer
Jorge Pombo (3 goals)
R. Besselink (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.3

League Difficulty: 53.8, Opponent Quality: 49.7

48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.02

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.02

2.45

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
43.9

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 60.8, Form: 30.4

46.1

Attack: 75.4, Defense: 23.0, Form: 32.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
Kifisia
De Graafschap
Kifisia

Power Rating Breakdown

43.9

Overall

Attack 33.8
Defense 60.8
Form 30.4
Consistency 62.8
De Graafschap

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 75.4
Defense 23.0
Form 32.5
Consistency 53.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.8 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kifisia logo Kifisia
L
De Graafschap (47%)
D
La Louvière (39%)
W
Larissa (41%)
D
Asteras (65%)
L
Atromitos (59%)
W
Panserraikos (49%)
W
Panaitolikos (48%)
D
Panaitolikos (43%)
De Graafschap logo De Graafschap
W
Kifisia (47%)
D
Almere (51%)
L
Almere (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
De Graafschap A
2 - 4 L
47%
La Louvière A
1 - 1 D
39%
Larissa H
3 - 2 W
41%
Asteras A
0 - 0 D
65%
Atromitos H
0 - 3 L
59%
Panserraikos A
2 - 1 W
49%
Panaitolikos A
1 - 0 W
48%
Panaitolikos H
0 - 0 D
43%
Larissa A
1 - 1 D
46%
Asteras H
0 - 0 D
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kifisia H
4 - 2 W
47%
Almere H
2 - 2 D
51%
Almere A
1 - 3 L
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.3 vs 48.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

De Graafschap's attack is on another level, averaging 2.3 goals per match with R. Besselink leading the charge (1 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Kifisia — 1.2 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of De Graafschap, who give up 2.3 goals per match at the other end.

Kifisia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

De Graafschap has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: De Graafschap is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 3 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Kifisia's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), De Graafschap prevailed 4-2 against Kifisia. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. De Graafschap secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Kifisia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. De Graafschap will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kifisia

Kifisia

VS
De Graafschap

De Graafschap

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kifisia

3W 5D 2L · 10 goals scored · 12 conceded

De Graafschap

1W 1D 1L · 7 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or