Skip to content
Compare King's Lynn vs Macclesfield

King's Lynn vs Macclesfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare King's Lynn vs Macclesfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

King's Lynn King's Lynn Home Team
Macclesfield Macclesfield Away Team
King's Lynn
33.8
D D L L D L W D W L

Last 10 Matches

Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Performance Radar

King's Lynn
Macclesfield

Categories Won

3

King's Lynn

3

Draw

9

Macclesfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Crane (3 goals)
J. Kay (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
26.7

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 42.1

29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.92

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.38

1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
33.8

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 38.4, Form: 15.3

37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3

46-60'

1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
King's Lynn
Macclesfield
King's Lynn

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 38.4
Form 15.3
Consistency 64.0
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

42.1 vs 45.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
King's Lynn logo King's Lynn
D
Chester (51%)
D
Chorley (32%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
L
Bedford (44%)
D
Peterborough S (30%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)
W
Leamington (31%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chester A
0 - 0 D
51%
Chorley H
1 - 1 D
32%
Kidderminster A
1 - 4 L
72%
Bedford H
0 - 1 L
44%
Peterborough S A
2 - 2 D
30%
Spennymoor H
0 - 1 L
40%
Leamington A
5 - 2 W
31%
Curzon Ashton H
0 - 0 D
27%
South Shields H
3 - 0 W
42%
Fylde A
1 - 4 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 26.7 vs 29.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Macclesfield holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus King's Lynn's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

King's Lynn's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: King's Lynn is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Macclesfield faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If King's Lynn can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Macclesfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

King's Lynn

King's Lynn

VS
Macclesfield

Macclesfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

King's Lynn

2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or