Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs AGF

KuPS vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
KuPS
74.2
W W W W D D W W D D

Last 10 Matches

AGF
56.1
W W W D D L D W D D

Performance Radar

KuPS
AGF

Categories Won

13

KuPS

1

Draw

1

AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 4D, 0L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+12

+12

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
T. Kristjánsson (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.7

League Difficulty: 50.2, Opponent Quality: 50.2

52.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.3

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.05

1.69

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
74.2

Attack: 75.1, Defense: 82.6, Form: 67.6

56.1

Attack: 54.5, Defense: 71.5, Form: 40.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

3
9

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
KuPS
AGF
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

74.2

Overall

Attack 75.1
Defense 82.6
Form 67.6
Consistency 71.2
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 54.5
Defense 71.5
Form 40.9
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.2 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.2 vs 50.3

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
Vardar (97%)
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
AGF logo AGF
W
Viborg (44%)
W
Brøndby (51%)
W
Sønderjyske (37%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (65%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
W
Viborg (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vardar A
2 - 0 W
97%
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viborg H
6 - 2 W
44%
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
51%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
37%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
65%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
60%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
49%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
46%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
42%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

KuPS has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 62.7) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.2). This means KuPS's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus AGF's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 0.8 and AGF conceding 0.9 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

KuPS is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (74.2 vs 56.1) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

6W 4D 0L · 20 goals scored · 8 conceded

AGF

4W 5D 1L · 16 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or