Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Atromitos

KuPS vs Atromitos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Atromitos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Atromitos Atromitos Away Team
KuPS
56.6
W W W D D W W D D L

Last 10 Matches

Atromitos
61.5
W L W L L W W W D D

Performance Radar

KuPS
Atromitos

Categories Won

1

KuPS

6

Draw

8

Atromitos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
M. Baku (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9

53.1

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.06

2.51

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 57.3, Defense: 63.7, Form: 47.8

61.5

Attack: 79.0, Defense: 61.9, Form: 51.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

4
8

31-45'

5
2

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

6
KuPS
Atromitos
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 57.3
Defense 63.7
Form 47.8
Consistency 61.3
Atromitos

Power Rating Breakdown

61.5

Overall

Attack 79.0
Defense 61.9
Form 51.6
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

45.9 vs 51.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Mariehamn (27%)
Atromitos logo Atromitos
W
Panserraikos (44%)
L
Larissa (46%)
W
Kifisia (57%)
L
Panaitolikos (46%)
L
Asteras (65%)
W
Asteras (60%)
W
Panserraikos (49%)
W
Larissa (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Panserraikos H
6 - 0 W
44%
Larissa A
1 - 2 L
46%
Kifisia A
3 - 0 W
57%
Panaitolikos H
1 - 2 L
46%
Asteras A
2 - 4 L
65%
Asteras H
2 - 1 W
60%
Panserraikos A
4 - 0 W
49%
Larissa H
3 - 2 W
41%
Kifisia H
0 - 0 D
52%
Panaitolikos A
1 - 1 D
51%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.5 vs 53.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Atromitos holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.0 and Atromitos conceding 1.2 per match.

KuPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Atromitos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Atromitos

Atromitos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded

Atromitos

5W 2D 3L · 23 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or