Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Brann

KuPS vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
KuPS
56.6
W W W D D W W D D L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
46.1
L L L W W W D L L W

Performance Radar

KuPS
Brann

Categories Won

8

KuPS

3

Draw

4

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
N. Holm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9

38.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.06

2.02

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 57.3, Defense: 63.7, Form: 47.8

46.1

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

4
8

31-45'

6
2

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

5
KuPS
Brann
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 57.3
Defense 63.7
Form 47.8
Consistency 61.3
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 44.1
Form 35.3
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

45.9 vs 52.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Mariehamn (27%)
Brann logo Brann
L
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
L
Aalesund (50%)
W
KFUM (39%)
W
Fredrikstad (47%)
W
Tromsø (55%)
D
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Viking (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg H
1 - 2 L
42%
Bodø/Glimt A
1 - 3 L
67%
Aalesund A
1 - 2 L
50%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
39%
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
47%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
55%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
44%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
76%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
47%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
57%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.5 vs 38.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Brann's 1.5.

KuPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded

Brann

4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or