Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Ilves

KuPS vs Ilves Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Ilves: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Ilves Ilves Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Ilves
45.6
L L D W L L W W L W

Performance Radar

KuPS
Ilves

Categories Won

5

KuPS

1

Draw

9

Ilves

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
T. Hytönen (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

49.9

League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 58.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

0.88

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

45.6

Attack: 36.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 40.0

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
KuPS
Ilves
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Ilves

Power Rating Breakdown

45.6

Overall

Attack 36.6
Defense 66.6
Form 40.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 58.2

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 58.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Ilves logo Ilves
L
VPS (50%)
L
Gnistan (58%)
D
Rijeka (70%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Rijeka (75%)
L
Oulu (43%)
W
Stjarnan (73%)
W
Lahti (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
VPS H
0 - 1 L
50%
Gnistan A
2 - 3 L
58%
Rijeka H
1 - 1 D
70%
Mariehamn H
2 - 0 W
29%
Rijeka A
0 - 1 L
75%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
43%
Stjarnan H
2 - 1 W
73%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
54%
Stjarnan A
0 - 1 L
75%
TPS A
3 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.5 vs 49.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of KuPS and Ilves is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.2 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

Ilves's backline outperforms KuPS's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.4.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Ilves has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

💡 Why This Matters: Ilves's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Ilves

Ilves

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Ilves

4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or