KuPS vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
Jaro
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
Jaro
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
2W, 2D, 6L
12 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
-2
-12
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
Jaro
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.5 vs 48.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Jaro's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
KuPS's backline outperforms Jaro's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, KuPS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Jaro can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for KuPS. In practical terms, KuPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While KuPS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KuPS
Jaro
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
Jaro
2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded
Popular Teams