Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Jaro

KuPS vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Performance Radar

KuPS
Jaro

Categories Won

9

KuPS

3

Draw

3

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

3

16-30'

2

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

KuPS
Jaro
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.5 vs 48.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Jaro's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

KuPS's backline outperforms Jaro's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, KuPS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Jaro can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for KuPS. In practical terms, KuPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While KuPS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or