Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Lahti

KuPS vs Lahti Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Lahti: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Lahti Lahti Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Lahti
52.8
W L D W L W W W D D

Performance Radar

KuPS
Lahti

Categories Won

5

KuPS

4

Draw

6

Lahti

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
Neemias Barbosa (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

52.8

Attack: 35.1, Defense: 79.8, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

3
KuPS
Lahti
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Lahti

Power Rating Breakdown

52.8

Overall

Attack 35.1
Defense 79.8
Form 47.9
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Lahti logo Lahti
W
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
D
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Jaro (33%)
L
Ilves (49%)
W
Mariehamn (34%)
W
HJK (55%)
W
Gnistan (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
2 - 1 W
44%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
43%
Inter Turku A
0 - 0 D
58%
Jaro H
2 - 0 W
33%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
49%
Mariehamn A
2 - 0 W
34%
HJK H
2 - 0 W
55%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
54%
Oulu A
1 - 1 D
43%
TPS H
0 - 0 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.5 vs 45.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.2 and Lahti averaging 1.1 goals per match.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Lahti — 0.5 goals conceded per game and 6 clean sheets put them well ahead of KuPS, who give up 1.4 goals per match at the other end.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Lahti has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Lahti has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Lahti. In practical terms, Lahti would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Lahti has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-16), KuPS prevailed 1-2 against Lahti. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, KuPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Lahti shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Lahti will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Lahti

Lahti

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Lahti

5W 3D 2L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or