Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Mariehamn

KuPS vs Mariehamn Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Mariehamn: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Mariehamn Mariehamn Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Mariehamn
28.3
W W L L D L L L L L

Performance Radar

KuPS
Mariehamn

Categories Won

10

KuPS

4

Draw

1

Mariehamn

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-15

-15

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
L. Richtnér (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

48.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.0

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

28.3

Attack: 29.5, Defense: 19.6, Form: 19.6

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
KuPS
Mariehamn
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Mariehamn

Power Rating Breakdown

28.3

Overall

Attack 29.5
Defense 19.6
Form 19.6
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 50.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Mariehamn logo Mariehamn
W
KuPS (48%)
W
SJK (40%)
L
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (54%)
D
Oulu (38%)
L
Lahti (54%)
L
Gnistan (58%)
L
VPS (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
KuPS A
4 - 2 W
48%
SJK H
2 - 0 W
40%
Ilves A
0 - 2 L
49%
TPS A
0 - 3 L
54%
Oulu H
1 - 1 D
38%
Lahti H
0 - 2 L
54%
Gnistan A
2 - 4 L
58%
VPS A
0 - 4 L
55%
Inter Turku H
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
0 - 4 L
55%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 48.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

KuPS (1.2 goals per match) and Mariehamn (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

KuPS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.4 goals per game and recording 1 clean sheets, compared to Mariehamn's leaky backline that surrenders 2.4 goals per match.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Mariehamn has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Mariehamn is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, KuPS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Mariehamn can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for KuPS. In practical terms, KuPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-23), Mariehamn prevailed 2-4 against KuPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Mariehamn achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against KuPS shows genuine quality and mental strength. KuPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Mariehamn will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Mariehamn

Mariehamn

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Mariehamn

2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 24 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or