KuPS vs Mariehamn Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs Mariehamn: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
Mariehamn
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
Mariehamn
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
2W, 1D, 7L
12 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
-2
-15
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Attack: 29.5, Defense: 19.6, Form: 19.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
Mariehamn
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 48.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
KuPS (1.2 goals per match) and Mariehamn (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
KuPS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.4 goals per game and recording 1 clean sheets, compared to Mariehamn's leaky backline that surrenders 2.4 goals per match.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Mariehamn has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Mariehamn is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, KuPS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Mariehamn can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for KuPS. In practical terms, KuPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-23), Mariehamn prevailed 2-4 against KuPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Mariehamn achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against KuPS shows genuine quality and mental strength. KuPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Mariehamn will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KuPS
Mariehamn
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
Mariehamn
2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 24 conceded
Popular Teams