Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Porto

KuPS vs Porto Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Porto: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Porto Porto Away Team
KuPS
74.2
W W W W D D W W D D

Last 10 Matches

Porto
59.5
W L W W W L W D D W

Performance Radar

KuPS
Porto

Categories Won

9

KuPS

6

Draw

0

Porto

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 4D, 0L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+12

+12

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
D. Gül (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.7

League Difficulty: 50.2, Opponent Quality: 50.2

54.0

League Difficulty: 80.2, Opponent Quality: 62.7

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.05

1.6

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
74.2

Attack: 75.1, Defense: 82.6, Form: 67.6

59.5

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 69.3, Form: 62.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
9

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

2
KuPS
Porto
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

74.2

Overall

Attack 75.1
Defense 82.6
Form 67.6
Consistency 71.2
Porto

Power Rating Breakdown

59.5

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 69.3
Form 62.4
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.2 vs 80.2

Opponent Quality

50.2 vs 62.7

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
Vardar (97%)
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
Porto logo Porto
W
Santa Clara (64%)
L
AVS (64%)
W
Alverca (57%)
W
Estrela (54%)
W
Tondela (50%)
L
Nottm Forest (76%)
W
Estoril (52%)
D
Nottm Forest (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vardar A
2 - 0 W
97%
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Santa Clara H
1 - 0 W
64%
AVS A
1 - 3 L
64%
Alverca H
1 - 0 W
57%
Estrela A
2 - 1 W
54%
Tondela H
2 - 0 W
50%
Nottm Forest A
0 - 1 L
76%
Estoril A
3 - 1 W
52%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 1 D
70%
Famalicão H
2 - 2 D
71%
Braga A
2 - 1 W
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 62.7 vs 54.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Porto's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 0.8 and Porto conceding 1.0 per match.

Porto has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Porto is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Porto

Porto

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

6W 4D 0L · 20 goals scored · 8 conceded

Porto

6W 2D 2L · 15 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or