Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Rijeka

KuPS vs Rijeka Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Rijeka: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Rijeka Rijeka Away Team
KuPS
56.6
W W W D D W W D D L

Last 10 Matches

Rijeka
42.8
W D W W D L D L W L

Performance Radar

KuPS
Rijeka

Categories Won

11

KuPS

2

Draw

2

Rijeka

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
T. Fruk (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9

34.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.06

1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 57.3, Defense: 63.7, Form: 47.8

42.8

Attack: 33.9, Defense: 59.4, Form: 33.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

8

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
KuPS
Rijeka
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 57.3
Defense 63.7
Form 47.8
Consistency 61.3
Rijeka

Power Rating Breakdown

42.8

Overall

Attack 33.9
Defense 59.4
Form 33.9
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

45.9 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Mariehamn (27%)
Rijeka logo Rijeka
W
Gorica (44%)
D
Istra (42%)
W
Vukovar (31%)
W
Lokomotiva (51%)
D
Hajduk (56%)
L
Varaždin (56%)
D
Dinamo Zagreb (75%)
L
Osijek (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
2 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
0 - 0 D
42%
Vukovar H
3 - 0 W
31%
Lokomotiva A
3 - 0 W
51%
Hajduk H
0 - 0 D
56%
Varaždin A
0 - 1 L
56%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 2 D
75%
Osijek H
0 - 2 L
38%
Slaven A
2 - 0 W
37%
Gorica A
0 - 4 L
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

KuPS has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 45.5) compared to Rijeka (SoS: 34.8). This means KuPS's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Rijeka's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.0 and Rijeka conceding 0.9 per match.

KuPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Rijeka

Rijeka

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded

Rijeka

4W 3D 3L · 12 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or