Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Teplice

KuPS vs Teplice Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Teplice: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Teplice Teplice Away Team
KuPS
74.1
W W W W D D W W D D

Last 10 Matches

Teplice
52.1
W W W W D L L L D D

Performance Radar

KuPS
Teplice

Categories Won

13

KuPS

2

Draw

0

Teplice

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 4D, 0L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+12

+12

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
D. Mareček (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.5

League Difficulty: 50.2, Opponent Quality: 49.7

53.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.04

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.04

1.72

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
74.1

Attack: 75.0, Defense: 82.5, Form: 67.5

52.1

Attack: 55.3, Defense: 62.2, Form: 41.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
9

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

6
KuPS
Teplice
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

74.1

Overall

Attack 75.0
Defense 82.5
Form 67.5
Consistency 71.2
Teplice

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 55.3
Defense 62.2
Form 41.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.2 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
Vardar (92%)
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
Teplice logo Teplice
W
Ml. Boleslav (63%)
W
Dukla (43%)
W
Zlín (46%)
W
Ostrava (39%)
D
Slovácko (37%)
L
Hradec Kr. (63%)
L
Zlín (46%)
L
Sparta Prague (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vardar A
2 - 0 W
92%
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ml. Boleslav A
2 - 0 W
63%
Dukla H
2 - 0 W
43%
Zlín A
4 - 2 W
46%
Ostrava H
2 - 1 W
39%
Slovácko H
1 - 1 D
37%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
63%
Zlín A
2 - 3 L
46%
Sparta Prague H
0 - 1 L
60%
Plzeň A
2 - 2 D
65%
Liberec A
1 - 1 D
45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 62.5 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Teplice's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Teplice's 1.2.

Teplice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

KuPS is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (74.1 vs 52.1) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Teplice

Teplice

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

6W 4D 0L · 20 goals scored · 8 conceded

Teplice

4W 3D 3L · 16 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or