Skip to content
Compare Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine

Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan Home Team
Palestine Palestine Away Team
Kyrgyzstan
34.9
D D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Palestine
44.9
D D L D W

Performance Radar

Kyrgyzstan
Palestine

Categories Won

5

Kyrgyzstan

4

Draw

6

Palestine

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 4D, 2L

20%

1W, 3D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

5 / 6 matches

0.6

3 / 5 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

9 / 6 matches

0.4

2 / 5 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
33%

2 / 6 matches

60%

3 / 5 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
33%

2 / 6 matches

0%

0 / 5 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

3 / 6 matches

20%

1 / 5 matches

Top Scorer
Kim Sung-Hye (1 goals)
Wessam Abou Ali (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.0

League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 63.0

51.5

League Difficulty: 74.0, Opponent Quality: 62.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.89

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.06

0.47

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
34.9

Attack: 27.2, Defense: 51.0, Form: 0.0

44.9

Attack: 20.3, Defense: 88.0, Form: 20.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
Kyrgyzstan
Palestine
Kyrgyzstan

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 27.2
Defense 51.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.3
Palestine

Power Rating Breakdown

44.9

Overall

Attack 20.3
Defense 88.0
Form 20.3
Consistency 71.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

75.0 vs 74.0

Opponent Quality

63.0 vs 62.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kyrgyzstan logo Kyrgyzstan
D
Palestine (70%)
D
Palestine (70%)
L
Madagascar (66%)
L
Equat Guinea (52%)
D
UAE (59%)
D
Korea DPR (61%)
Palestine logo Palestine
D
Kyrgyzstan (66%)
D
Kyrgyzstan (66%)
L
Malaysia (77%)
D
Oman (50%)
W
Kuwait (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Palestine H
0 - 0 D
70%
Palestine H
0 - 0 D
70%
Madagascar H
2 - 5 L
66%
Equat Guinea H
0 - 1 L
52%
UAE H
1 - 1 D
59%
Korea DPR A
2 - 2 D
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kyrgyzstan A
0 - 0 D
66%
Kyrgyzstan A
0 - 0 D
66%
Malaysia A
0 - 1 L
77%
Oman H
1 - 1 D
50%
Kuwait A
2 - 0 W
54%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (52.0 vs 51.5), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Kyrgyzstan and Palestine is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 0.8 and 0.6 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Palestine is far superior, conceding just 0.4 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Kyrgyzstan leaks 1.5 goals per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.6 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Kyrgyzstan is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Palestine is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Palestine. In practical terms, Palestine would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Palestine has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2026-06-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2026-06-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan

VS
Palestine

Palestine

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kyrgyzstan

0W 4D 2L · 5 goals scored · 9 conceded

Palestine

1W 3D 1L · 3 goals scored · 2 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or