Skip to content
Compare Lahti vs Gnistan

Lahti vs Gnistan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lahti vs Gnistan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lahti Lahti Home Team
Gnistan Gnistan Away Team
Lahti
43.5
W D D L L W L D D L

Last 10 Matches

Gnistan
55.8
L D D W W W L W D W

Performance Radar

Lahti
Gnistan

Categories Won

2

Lahti

3

Draw

10

Gnistan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Tòfol Montiel (2 goals)
A. Akinyemi (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9

45.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.13

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.07

1.42

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
43.5

Attack: 39.2, Defense: 65.3, Form: 19.6

55.8

Attack: 53.8, Defense: 69.7, Form: 47.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

4

76-90+'

1
Lahti
Gnistan
Lahti

Power Rating Breakdown

43.5

Overall

Attack 39.2
Defense 65.3
Form 19.6
Consistency 64.0
Gnistan

Power Rating Breakdown

55.8

Overall

Attack 53.8
Defense 69.7
Form 47.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.9 vs 45.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lahti logo Lahti
W
Gnistan (56%)
D
Oulu (54%)
D
TPS (41%)
L
Gnistan (60%)
L
SJK (41%)
W
Ilves (46%)
L
KuPS (67%)
D
VPS (58%)
Gnistan logo Gnistan
L
Lahti (48%)
D
VPS (58%)
D
Jaro (34%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Mariehamn (27%)
W
SJK (41%)
L
Ilves (51%)
W
Jaro (29%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
56%
Oulu A
1 - 1 D
54%
TPS H
0 - 0 D
41%
Gnistan A
0 - 1 L
60%
SJK H
2 - 3 L
41%
Ilves H
5 - 0 W
46%
KuPS A
1 - 2 L
67%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
58%
Mariehamn H
1 - 1 D
22%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lahti A
0 - 1 L
48%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
58%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
34%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
43%
Mariehamn A
3 - 0 W
27%
SJK H
3 - 2 W
41%
Ilves A
0 - 2 L
51%
Jaro H
5 - 0 W
29%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
2 - 0 W
56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 47.9 vs 45.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Gnistan holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Lahti's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Lahti conceding 1.0 and Gnistan conceding 0.8 per match.

Lahti has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Gnistan, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Gnistan has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-04), Lahti prevailed 1-0 against Gnistan. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lahti secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gnistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lahti will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-06-17), Gnistan prevailed 1-0 against Lahti. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Gnistan secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Lahti will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Gnistan will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lahti

Lahti

VS
Gnistan

Gnistan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Lahti

2W 4D 4L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

Gnistan

5W 3D 2L · 17 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or