Skip to content
Compare Larissa vs Standard

Larissa vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larissa vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larissa Larissa Home Team
Standard Standard Away Team
Larissa
38.5
L W D D D L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Standard
54.5
L W D W W D L W L W

Performance Radar

Larissa
Standard

Categories Won

3

Larissa

3

Draw

9

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Ľ. Tupta (5 goals)
T. Nkada (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.7

49.6

League Difficulty: 50.8, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.13

1.53

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
38.5

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 10.5

54.5

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 63.1, Form: 49.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

6
Larissa
Standard
Larissa

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 42.1
Defense 45.6
Form 10.5
Consistency 75.7
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

54.5

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 63.1
Form 49.8
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 50.8

Opponent Quality

54.7 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Larissa logo Larissa
L
Kifisia (57%)
W
Atromitos (59%)
D
Panaitolikos (51%)
D
Asteras (60%)
D
Panserraikos (49%)
L
Panserraikos (44%)
D
Kifisia (52%)
L
Atromitos (64%)
Standard logo Standard
L
Charleroi (51%)
W
Westerlo (47%)
D
Genk (52%)
W
OHL (33%)
W
Antwerp (47%)
D
Genk (56%)
L
Antwerp (42%)
W
Charleroi (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kifisia A
2 - 3 L
57%
Atromitos H
2 - 1 W
59%
Panaitolikos A
1 - 1 D
51%
Asteras H
1 - 1 D
60%
Panserraikos A
1 - 1 D
49%
Panserraikos H
0 - 1 L
44%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
52%
Atromitos A
2 - 3 L
64%
Panaitolikos H
1 - 2 L
46%
Asteras A
1 - 3 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
51%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
47%
Genk H
0 - 0 D
52%
OHL H
2 - 1 W
33%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
47%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
56%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
42%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
56%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
54%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
50%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 49.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Larissa's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Larissa's 1.7.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (54.5 vs 38.5) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larissa

Larissa

VS
Standard

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Larissa

1W 4D 5L · 12 goals scored · 17 conceded

Standard

5W 2D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or