Latvia vs N. Macedonia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Latvia vs N. Macedonia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Latvia
Home Team
N. Macedonia
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Latvia
Draw
N. Macedonia
Statistical Comparison
2W, 4D, 4L
1W, 5D, 4L
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
-6
-10
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 83.4, Opponent Quality: 56.2
League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 65.2
0W / 1 matches
0W / 4 matches
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.03
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.05
Attack: 20.6, Defense: 61.8, Form: 20.6
Attack: 28.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 10.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Latvia
N. Macedonia
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (53.0 vs 55.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Latvia (0.6 goals per match) and N. Macedonia (0.8 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Latvia has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to N. Macedonia's 1.8.
N. Macedonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 2.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Latvia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: N. Macedonia is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
💡 Why This Matters: N. Macedonia's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2025-11-13). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Latvia
N. Macedonia
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Latvia
2W 4D 4L · 6 goals scored · 12 conceded
N. Macedonia
1W 5D 4L · 8 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams