Skip to content
Compare Macclesfield vs Hereford

Macclesfield vs Hereford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Macclesfield vs Hereford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Macclesfield Macclesfield Home Team
Hereford Hereford Away Team
Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Last 10 Matches

Hereford
37.2
L D W W L D W W L L

Performance Radar

Macclesfield
Hereford

Categories Won

5

Macclesfield

3

Draw

7

Hereford

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

0

0

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Kay (2 goals)
M. Lane (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
29%

2W / 7 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.4

27.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

1.21

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

37.2

Attack: 38.6, Defense: 38.6, Form: 30.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
Macclesfield
Hereford
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8
Hereford

Power Rating Breakdown

37.2

Overall

Attack 38.6
Defense 38.6
Form 30.8
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

45.4 vs 41.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (46%)
D
Leek (46%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)
Hereford logo Hereford
L
Solihull (54%)
D
Peterborough S (24%)
W
Marine (32%)
W
Radcliffe (25%)
L
Oxford City (53%)
D
Bedford (49%)
W
Marine (37%)
W
Merthyr (30%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
46%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
46%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Solihull H
0 - 3 L
54%
Peterborough S H
2 - 2 D
24%
Marine H
2 - 1 W
32%
Radcliffe H
3 - 1 W
25%
Oxford City H
1 - 2 L
53%
Bedford A
2 - 2 D
49%
Marine A
1 - 0 W
37%
Merthyr H
3 - 0 W
30%
Kidderminster A
1 - 2 L
72%
Macclesfield H
0 - 2 L
39%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.7 vs 27.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Macclesfield and Hereford is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.5 goals per game respectively.

Hereford's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Macclesfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-03-31), Macclesfield prevailed 0-2 against Hereford. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Macclesfield achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Hereford shows genuine quality and mental strength. Hereford will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Macclesfield will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Macclesfield

Macclesfield

VS
Hereford

Hereford

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Hereford

4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or