Skip to content
Compare Malaysia vs Azerbaijan

Malaysia vs Azerbaijan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malaysia vs Azerbaijan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malaysia Malaysia Home Team
Azerbaijan Azerbaijan Away Team
Malaysia
47.1
L L L W L L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Azerbaijan
64.5
W L W W L W W W W W

Performance Radar

Malaysia
Azerbaijan

Categories Won

4

Malaysia

1

Draw

10

Azerbaijan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
44%

4W, 0D, 5L

80%

8W, 0D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

14 / 9 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

18 / 9 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
22%

2 / 9 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
56%

5 / 9 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
44%

4 / 9 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N/A (0 goals)
S. Cəfərzadə (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

4W / 8 matches

83%

5W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 72.4

41.5

League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.87

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.31

1.8

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
47.1

Attack: 59.9, Defense: 37.4, Form: 49.4

64.5

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 70.2, Form: 73.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3

16-30'

2

31-45'

1

46-60'

1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

2
Malaysia
Azerbaijan
Malaysia

Power Rating Breakdown

47.1

Overall

Attack 59.9
Defense 37.4
Form 49.4
Consistency 33.3
Azerbaijan

Power Rating Breakdown

64.5

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 70.2
Form 73.2
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 59.0

Opponent Quality

72.4 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
Malaysia logo Malaysia
L
Palestine (66%)
L
Jordan (80%)
L
Azerbaijan (80%)
W
Bangladesh (47%)
L
Hong Kong (82%)
L
Hong Kong (82%)
W
UAE (68%)
W
UAE (68%)
Azerbaijan logo Azerbaijan
W
N. Macedonia (34%)
L
Hungary (66%)
W
Andorra (36%)
W
Andorra (40%)
L
Hungary (71%)
W
N. Macedonia (30%)
W
Bangladesh (47%)
W
Malaysia (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Palestine H
0 - 2 L
66%
Jordan A
3 - 4 L
80%
Azerbaijan A
0 - 2 L
80%
Bangladesh A
1 - 0 W
47%
Hong Kong A
0 - 5 L
82%
Hong Kong A
2 - 3 L
82%
UAE A
2 - 0 W
68%
UAE A
3 - 1 W
68%
Bhutan A
3 - 1 W
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
N. Macedonia A
3 - 1 W
34%
Hungary H
1 - 2 L
66%
Andorra H
2 - 0 W
36%
Andorra A
3 - 1 W
40%
Hungary A
0 - 1 L
71%
N. Macedonia H
2 - 0 W
30%
Bangladesh A
2 - 1 W
47%
Malaysia H
2 - 0 W
58%
Kazakhstan A
1 - 0 W
65%
Kazakhstan A
2 - 1 W
65%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Malaysia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 62.3 against considerably stronger competition than Azerbaijan (SoS: 41.5). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

The attacking output of Malaysia and Azerbaijan is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.

Azerbaijan holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.7 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Malaysia's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

Malaysia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Azerbaijan has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Azerbaijan is a strong road performer with a 83% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

🔥 Form Momentum: Azerbaijan is in scorching form, winning 8 of their last 10 matches with 18 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Azerbaijan is on the rise with 8W in last 10, while Malaysia shows signs of decline with 4W in last 9.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Azerbaijan. In practical terms, Azerbaijan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Azerbaijan in this contest. Their superior power rating of 64.5, compared to 47.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Internationals Women match (2025-11-29), Azerbaijan prevailed 2-0 against Malaysia. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Azerbaijan secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Malaysia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Azerbaijan will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malaysia

Malaysia

VS
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Malaysia

4W 0D 5L · 14 goals scored · 18 conceded

Azerbaijan

8W 0D 2L · 18 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or