Skip to content
Compare Man Utd vs Spurs

Man Utd vs Spurs Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Man Utd vs Spurs: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Man Utd Man Utd Home Team
Spurs Spurs Away Team
Man Utd
33.8
L D D L L L W D L L

Last 10 Matches

Spurs
36.4
W W D L L L L D W L

Performance Radar

Man Utd
Spurs

Categories Won

3

Man Utd

3

Draw

9

Spurs

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Malard (2 goals)
O. Holdt (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

35.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.64

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: +0.06

1.62

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
33.8

Attack: 23.4, Defense: 50.2, Form: 10.0

36.4

Attack: 54.3, Defense: 20.0, Form: 25.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

46-60'

1

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

8
Man Utd
Spurs
Man Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 23.4
Defense 50.2
Form 10.0
Consistency 74.8
Spurs

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 54.3
Defense 20.0
Form 25.7
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 50.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Man Utd logo Man Utd
L
Chelsea (63%)
D
Brighton (47%)
D
Spurs (45%)
L
Bayern Munich (53%)
L
Man City (67%)
L
Bayern Munich (50%)
W
Everton (44%)
D
West Ham (44%)
Spurs logo Spurs
W
Brighton (52%)
W
London City (44%)
D
Man Utd (33%)
L
Chelsea (63%)
L
Arsenal (62%)
L
Man City (72%)
L
Everton (44%)
D
London City (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chelsea A
0 - 1 L
63%
Brighton H
1 - 1 D
47%
Spurs A
0 - 0 D
45%
Bayern Munich A
1 - 2 L
53%
Man City H
0 - 3 L
67%
Bayern Munich H
2 - 3 L
50%
Everton H
2 - 1 W
44%
West Ham A
0 - 0 D
44%
Chelsea A
0 - 2 L
63%
Chelsea A
1 - 2 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brighton A
2 - 1 W
52%
London City H
2 - 1 W
44%
Man Utd H
0 - 0 D
33%
Chelsea A
1 - 2 L
63%
Arsenal A
2 - 5 L
62%
Man City A
2 - 5 L
72%
Everton H
1 - 2 L
44%
London City A
2 - 2 D
50%
Aston Villa A
7 - 3 W
30%
Chelsea H
0 - 2 L
58%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Context matters here: Man Utd's schedule strength (SoS: 50.3) has been notably more demanding than Spurs's (SoS: 35.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Few sides can match Spurs in front of goal. Their 1.9 average per fixture tells the story, with O. Holdt driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.

Man Utd's backline outperforms Spurs's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.3.

Man Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Man Utd is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Man Utd's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Women's Super League (2026-04-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Man Utd

Man Utd

VS
Spurs

Spurs

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Man Utd

1W 3D 6L · 7 goals scored · 15 conceded

Spurs

3W 2D 5L · 19 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or