Mariehamn vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Mariehamn vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Mariehamn
Home Team
TPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Mariehamn
Draw
TPS
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 7L
4W, 3D, 3L
9 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
-15
+4
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17
Attack: 29.5, Defense: 19.6, Form: 19.6
Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Mariehamn
TPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.2 vs 45.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
TPS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to Mariehamn's 0.9 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for TPS — 1.1 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of Mariehamn, who give up 2.4 goals per match at the other end.
Mariehamn has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Mariehamn is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TPS. In practical terms, TPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward TPS in this contest. Their superior power rating of 48.6, compared to 28.3 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-01), TPS prevailed 3-0 against Mariehamn. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — TPS completely dominated Mariehamn in that encounter, raising serious questions about Mariehamn's ability to compete at this level. Mariehamn will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Mariehamn
TPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Mariehamn
2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 24 conceded
TPS
4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams