Skip to content
Compare Kharkiv vs SK Poltava

Kharkiv vs SK Poltava Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kharkiv vs SK Poltava: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kharkiv Kharkiv Home Team
SK Poltava SK Poltava Away Team
Kharkiv
38.5
L L D L W D D D L D

Last 10 Matches

SK Poltava
28.6
D L L L D L D L D L

Performance Radar

Kharkiv
SK Poltava

Categories Won

9

Kharkiv

4

Draw

2

SK Poltava

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

0%

0W, 4D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Itodo (3 goals)
V. Sad (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.1

League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 61.0

64.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.21

0.79

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
38.5

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 10.2

28.6

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 26.6, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1

76-90+'

Kharkiv
SK Poltava
Kharkiv

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 54.5
Form 10.2
Consistency 77.2
SK Poltava

Power Rating Breakdown

28.6

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 26.6
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.8 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

61.0 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kharkiv logo Kharkiv
L
Schalke 04 (53%)
L
Fagiano (39%)
D
Hradec Kr. (60%)
L
Jablonec (39%)
W
Veres Rivne (56%)
D
Epitsentr (67%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (78%)
D
Zorya (75%)
SK Poltava logo SK Poltava
D
Epitsentr (72%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (75%)
L
LNZ Cherkasy (70%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
D
Kryvbas KR (72%)
L
Kolos (85%)
D
Obolon (68%)
L
Polissya (73%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Schalke 04 H
0 - 2 L
53%
Fagiano H
1 - 2 L
39%
Hradec Kr. A
3 - 3 D
60%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
39%
Veres Rivne A
1 - 0 W
56%
Epitsentr H
1 - 1 D
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
2 - 2 D
78%
Zorya A
1 - 1 D
75%
Polissya H
0 - 1 L
73%
LNZ Cherkasy A
1 - 1 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Epitsentr A
0 - 0 D
72%
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 2 L
75%
LNZ Cherkasy A
0 - 2 L
70%
Shakhtar D H
0 - 4 L
78%
Kryvbas KR H
3 - 3 D
72%
Kolos A
0 - 2 L
85%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
68%
Polissya H
0 - 4 L
73%
Oleksandria H
3 - 3 D
54%
Kharkiv A
0 - 2 L
65%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

SK Poltava has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.1) compared to Kharkiv (SoS: 52.1). This means SK Poltava's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Kharkiv leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.0 goals per game compared to SK Poltava's 0.7 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Kharkiv — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of SK Poltava, who give up 2.3 goals per match at the other end.

Kharkiv has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

SK Poltava has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Kharkiv is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: SK Poltava is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Kharkiv faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If SK Poltava can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Kharkiv. In practical terms, Kharkiv would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Kharkiv has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.9-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In the Ukraine Premier League (2026-03-19), Kharkiv beat SK Poltava 2-0. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Kharkiv secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. SK Poltava will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Kharkiv will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kharkiv

Kharkiv

VS
SK Poltava

SK Poltava

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kharkiv

1W 5D 4L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded

SK Poltava

0W 4D 6L · 7 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or