Skip to content
Compare Minnesota vs Austin

Minnesota vs Austin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Minnesota vs Austin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Minnesota Minnesota Home Team
Austin Austin Away Team
Minnesota
52.9
D L L D W L W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Austin
35.2
L L L D W W L D L D

Performance Radar

Minnesota
Austin

Categories Won

6

Minnesota

6

Draw

3

Austin

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-10

-10

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Yeboah (6 goals)
M. Uzuni (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.1

53.9

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.06

1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 65.0, Form: 51.4

35.2

Attack: 48.5, Defense: 20.8, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

5
Minnesota
Austin
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 65.0
Form 51.4
Consistency 45.7
Austin

Power Rating Breakdown

35.2

Overall

Attack 48.5
Defense 20.8
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.1 vs 53.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Minnesota logo Minnesota
D
Salt Lake (56%)
L
New England (66%)
L
Colorado (39%)
D
Austin (40%)
W
Columbus (55%)
L
LAFC (46%)
W
Dallas (62%)
W
Portland (46%)
Austin logo Austin
L
St. Louis (57%)
L
Sporting KC (31%)
L
San Diego (44%)
D
Minnesota (60%)
W
St. Louis (52%)
W
Houston (50%)
L
Earthquakes (68%)
D
Toronto (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
56%
New England A
1 - 2 L
66%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
39%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
40%
Columbus A
3 - 2 W
55%
LAFC H
0 - 1 L
46%
Dallas A
1 - 0 W
62%
Portland H
2 - 0 W
46%
San Diego A
2 - 1 W
44%
Galaxy A
2 - 1 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St. Louis A
0 - 3 L
57%
Sporting KC H
1 - 2 L
31%
San Diego A
0 - 5 L
44%
Minnesota A
2 - 2 D
60%
St. Louis H
2 - 0 W
52%
Houston H
2 - 0 W
50%
Earthquakes A
1 - 5 L
68%
Toronto A
3 - 3 D
49%
Galaxy H
1 - 2 L
52%
Inter Miami A
2 - 2 D
68%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.7 vs 53.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Minnesota averaging 1.4 and Austin averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Defensively, Minnesota is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Austin leaks 2.4 per match.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Austin has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Minnesota is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Minnesota emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.9 vs 35.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-05-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Minnesota

Minnesota

VS
Austin

Austin

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Minnesota

5W 2D 3L · 14 goals scored · 11 conceded

Austin

2W 3D 5L · 14 goals scored · 24 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or