Mjällby vs IFK Göteborg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Mjällby vs IFK Göteborg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Mjällby
Home Team
IFK Göteborg
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Mjällby
Draw
IFK Göteborg
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
3W, 1D, 6L
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
27 / 10 matches
+4
-13
2 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 54.7, Opponent Quality: 54.3
League Difficulty: 52.8, Opponent Quality: 56.4
1W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 62.0, Defense: 55.1, Form: 31.0
Attack: 42.4, Defense: 9.1, Form: 27.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Mjällby
IFK Göteborg
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Mjällby's schedule strength (SoS: 53.4) has been notably more demanding than IFK Göteborg's (SoS: 40.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Mjällby holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus IFK Göteborg's 1.4, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Mjällby holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.4 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to IFK Göteborg's leaky backline that surrenders 2.7 goals per match.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Mjällby faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If IFK Göteborg can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Mjällby. In practical terms, Mjällby would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Mjällby in this contest. Their superior power rating of 50.4, compared to 30.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Swedish Allsvenskan (2026-05-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Mjällby
IFK Göteborg
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Mjällby
3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 14 conceded
IFK Göteborg
3W 1D 6L · 14 goals scored · 27 conceded
Popular Teams