ML Vitebsk vs Sutjeska Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare ML Vitebsk vs Sutjeska: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
ML Vitebsk
Draw
Sutjeska
Statistical Comparison
3W, 0D, 3L
0W, 0D, 4L
8 / 6 matches
2 / 4 matches
8 / 6 matches
9 / 4 matches
0
-7
1 / 6 matches
0 / 4 matches
4 / 6 matches
3 / 4 matches
3 / 6 matches
2 / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 84.3, Opponent Quality: 67.5
League Difficulty: 87.5, Opponent Quality: 65.5
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37
Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.14
Attack: 46.5, Defense: 60.8, Form: 53.6
Attack: 20.7, Defense: 33.1, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Sutjeska's schedule strength (SoS: 74.3) has been notably more demanding than ML Vitebsk's (SoS: 57.3), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
ML Vitebsk holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Sutjeska's 0.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, ML Vitebsk is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Sutjeska leaks 2.2 goals per match.
ML Vitebsk has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Sutjeska has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Sutjeska is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. ML Vitebsk is on the rise with 3W in last 6, while Sutjeska shows signs of decline with 0W in last 4.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, ML Vitebsk faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Sutjeska can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for ML Vitebsk. In practical terms, ML Vitebsk would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, ML Vitebsk holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 50.1 against 29.5 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-30), ML Vitebsk came out on top with a 1-2 victory over Sutjeska. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, ML Vitebsk achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Sutjeska shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Sutjeska will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. ML Vitebsk will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), ML Vitebsk came out on top with a 3-0 victory over Sutjeska. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. ML Vitebsk secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — ML Vitebsk completely dominated Sutjeska in that encounter, raising serious questions about Sutjeska's ability to compete at this level. Sutjeska will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. ML Vitebsk will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
ML Vitebsk
Sutjeska
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
ML Vitebsk
3W 0D 3L · 8 goals scored · 8 conceded
Sutjeska
0W 0D 4L · 2 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams