Molde vs HamKam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Molde vs HamKam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Molde
Home Team
HamKam
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Molde
Draw
HamKam
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
2W, 3D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
0
-6
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.02
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22
Attack: 59.9, Defense: 40.0, Form: 40.0
Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Molde
HamKam
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Context matters here: Molde's schedule strength (SoS: 49.9) has been notably more demanding than HamKam's (SoS: 38.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Molde leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to HamKam's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Molde and HamKam are evenly matched, allowing 1.8 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.
Molde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Molde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for Molde. In practical terms, Molde would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Molde holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.6-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Molde
HamKam
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Molde
4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 18 conceded
HamKam
2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams