Skip to content
Compare Molde vs HamKam

Molde vs HamKam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Molde vs HamKam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Molde Molde Home Team
HamKam HamKam Away Team
Molde
46.7
W L D W L D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

HamKam
34.1
L D W L L L D D W L

Performance Radar

Molde
HamKam

Categories Won

11

Molde

3

Draw

1

HamKam

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Hestad (5 goals)
A. Potur (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.9

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9

38.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.78

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.02

0.98

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
46.7

Attack: 59.9, Defense: 40.0, Form: 40.0

34.1

Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

4

61-75'

2
5

76-90+'

4
Molde
HamKam
Molde

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 59.9
Defense 40.0
Form 40.0
Consistency 44.8
HamKam

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 35.5
Defense 35.5
Form 17.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

49.9 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Molde logo Molde
W
Tromsø (58%)
L
Kristiansund (40%)
D
Sarpsborg (52%)
W
KFUM (47%)
L
Brann (59%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
W
Sandefjord (38%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
HamKam logo HamKam
L
Brann (64%)
D
Aalesund (44%)
W
Vålerenga (50%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Tromsø (58%)
D
Sandefjord (43%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
3 - 2 W
58%
Kristiansund A
1 - 2 L
40%
Sarpsborg H
3 - 3 D
52%
KFUM A
4 - 2 W
47%
Brann H
1 - 2 L
59%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
2 - 1 W
38%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 2 L
57%
Kristiansund H
1 - 0 W
35%
Tromsø A
0 - 2 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brann A
0 - 3 L
64%
Aalesund H
1 - 1 D
44%
Vålerenga A
3 - 0 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
0 - 1 L
57%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 3 L
75%
Tromsø H
1 - 4 L
58%
Sandefjord A
2 - 2 D
43%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Lillestrøm H
2 - 0 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 2 L
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Context matters here: Molde's schedule strength (SoS: 49.9) has been notably more demanding than HamKam's (SoS: 38.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Molde leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to HamKam's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Molde and HamKam are evenly matched, allowing 1.8 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.

Molde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Molde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for Molde. In practical terms, Molde would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Molde holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.6-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Molde

Molde

VS
HamKam

HamKam

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Molde

4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 18 conceded

HamKam

2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or