Skip to content
Compare Molde vs Rosenborg

Molde vs Rosenborg Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Molde vs Rosenborg: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Molde Molde Home Team
Rosenborg Rosenborg Away Team
Molde
46.7
W L D W L D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Rosenborg
46.6
W W L W L W W D L L

Performance Radar

Molde
Rosenborg

Categories Won

4

Molde

3

Draw

8

Rosenborg

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Hestad (5 goals)
A. Chiakha (8 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.9

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9

37.4

League Difficulty: 49.5, Opponent Quality: 50.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.78

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.02

1.98

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
46.7

Attack: 59.9, Defense: 40.0, Form: 40.0

46.6

Attack: 58.3, Defense: 40.8, Form: 43.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

4
5

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

7
Molde
Rosenborg
Molde

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 59.9
Defense 40.0
Form 40.0
Consistency 44.8
Rosenborg

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 58.3
Defense 40.8
Form 43.7
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 49.5

Opponent Quality

49.9 vs 50.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Molde logo Molde
W
Tromsø (58%)
L
Kristiansund (40%)
D
Sarpsborg (52%)
W
KFUM (47%)
L
Brann (59%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
W
Sandefjord (38%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
Rosenborg logo Rosenborg
W
Viking (59%)
W
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Brann (64%)
W
Fredrikstad (48%)
L
Man Utd (50%)
W
Start (38%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
D
Bodø/Glimt (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
3 - 2 W
58%
Kristiansund A
1 - 2 L
40%
Sarpsborg H
3 - 3 D
52%
KFUM A
4 - 2 W
47%
Brann H
1 - 2 L
59%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
2 - 1 W
38%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 2 L
57%
Kristiansund H
1 - 0 W
35%
Tromsø A
0 - 2 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viking H
2 - 1 W
59%
Lillestrøm A
2 - 0 W
47%
Brann A
2 - 3 L
64%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
48%
Man Utd H
0 - 5 L
50%
Start A
3 - 0 W
38%
Kristiansund H
3 - 0 W
35%
Bodø/Glimt H
2 - 2 D
70%
KFUM A
0 - 2 L
47%
Aalesund H
2 - 3 L
44%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Context matters here: Molde's schedule strength (SoS: 49.9) has been notably more demanding than Rosenborg's (SoS: 37.4), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

The attacking output of Molde and Rosenborg is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.8 and 2.0 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Molde and Rosenborg are evenly matched, allowing 1.8 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Molde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Rosenborg has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Molde's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Molde

Molde

VS
Rosenborg

Rosenborg

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Molde

4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 18 conceded

Rosenborg

5W 1D 4L · 20 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or