Skip to content
Compare Montpellier vs Metz

Montpellier vs Metz Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Montpellier vs Metz: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Montpellier Montpellier Home Team
Metz Metz Away Team
Montpellier
57.2
W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Metz
46.7
W W W D L L D L L D

Performance Radar

Montpellier
Metz

Categories Won

7

Montpellier

3

Draw

5

Metz

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

3W, 0D, 2L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

11 / 5 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

7 / 5 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
60%

3 / 5 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

3 / 5 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

2 / 5 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Alexandre Mendy (2 goals)
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 17
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

49.4

League Difficulty: 73.7, Opponent Quality: 56.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.07

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.13

2.15

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
57.2

Attack: 71.4, Defense: 51.9, Form: 58.4

46.7

Attack: 66.3, Defense: 39.8, Form: 29.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Montpellier
Metz
Montpellier

Power Rating Breakdown

57.2

Overall

Attack 71.4
Defense 51.9
Form 58.4
Consistency 35.2
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 66.3
Defense 39.8
Form 29.8
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 73.7

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 56.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Montpellier logo Montpellier
W
Clermont (48%)
L
Cannes (44%)
L
Nice (59%)
W
Metz (50%)
W
Canet (43%)
Metz logo Metz
W
Fortuna (32%)
W
Sochaux (47%)
W
Seraing (33%)
D
Nice (75%)
L
Lorient (63%)
L
Monaco (62%)
D
Le Havre (66%)
L
Paris FC (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clermont A
1 - 0 W
48%
Cannes H
3 - 4 L
44%
Nice A
2 - 3 L
59%
Metz A
4 - 0 W
50%
Canet A
1 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fortuna H
3 - 1 W
32%
Sochaux H
4 - 1 W
47%
Seraing H
6 - 0 W
33%
Nice A
0 - 0 D
75%
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
63%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
62%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
66%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
74%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
64%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.3 vs 49.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Montpellier and Metz is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 2.2 and 2.0 goals per game respectively.

Montpellier has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Metz's 1.8.

Montpellier has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Montpellier is a strong road performer with a 75% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Montpellier faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Metz can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Montpellier. In practical terms, Montpellier would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Montpellier has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Coupe de France match (2026-01-11), Montpellier prevailed 0-4 against Metz. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Montpellier achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Metz shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — Montpellier completely dominated Metz in that encounter, raising serious questions about Metz's ability to compete at this level. Metz will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Montpellier will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Montpellier

Montpellier

VS
Metz

Metz

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Montpellier

3W 0D 2L · 11 goals scored · 7 conceded

Metz

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or