Montréal vs Chicago Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Montréal vs Chicago: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Montréal
Home Team
Chicago
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Montréal
Draw
Chicago
Statistical Comparison
1W, 6D, 3L
6W, 1D, 3L
13 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-3
+3
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
0W / 7 matches
3W / 4 matches
1W / 3 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.14
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.03
Attack: 39.0, Defense: 42.0, Form: 9.0
Attack: 62.4, Defense: 52.0, Form: 62.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Montréal
Chicago
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Chicago's schedule strength (SoS: 54.0) has been notably more demanding than Montréal's (SoS: 40.0), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Offensively, Chicago outperforms Montréal with 1.8 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Both defenses are comparable, with Montréal conceding 1.6 and Chicago conceding 1.5 per match.
Chicago has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Chicago has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Montréal is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Chicago has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Chicago is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Montréal shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chicago faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Montréal can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Chicago. In practical terms, Chicago would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Chicago in this contest. Their superior power rating of 56.9, compared to 36.8 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Major League Soccer match (2026-05-16), Chicago prevailed 0-2 against Montréal. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Chicago achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Montréal shows genuine quality and mental strength. Montréal will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chicago will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Montréal
Chicago
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Montréal
1W 6D 3L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded
Chicago
6W 1D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams