Skip to content
Compare Montréal vs Chicago

Montréal vs Chicago Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Montréal vs Chicago: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Montréal Montréal Home Team
Chicago Chicago Away Team
Montréal
42.7
D L D W L W W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Chicago
66.8
W W W L L W D W W W

Performance Radar

Montréal
Chicago

Categories Won

1

Montréal

4

Draw

10

Chicago

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Owusu (7 goals)
H. Cuypers (10 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.5

51.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

2.11

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
42.7

Attack: 61.4, Defense: 30.7, Form: 30.7

66.8

Attack: 74.4, Defense: 60.8, Form: 71.0

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

4
3

31-45'

2

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

6
5

76-90+'

4
Montréal
Chicago
Montréal

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 61.4
Defense 30.7
Form 30.7
Consistency 49.3
Chicago

Power Rating Breakdown

66.8

Overall

Attack 74.4
Defense 60.8
Form 71.0
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.5 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Montréal logo Montréal
D
DC United (51%)
L
Chicago (63%)
D
Portland (46%)
W
Orlando (42%)
L
Atlanta United (45%)
W
NYCFC (43%)
W
New York (51%)
L
Philadelphia (40%)
Chicago logo Chicago
W
Toronto (44%)
W
Montréal (50%)
W
DC United (51%)
L
New York (51%)
L
Cincinnati (53%)
W
Sporting KC (31%)
D
Cincinnati (58%)
W
Atlanta United (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
DC United A
4 - 4 D
51%
Chicago H
0 - 2 L
63%
Portland H
2 - 2 D
46%
Orlando H
2 - 0 W
42%
Atlanta United A
1 - 3 L
45%
NYCFC H
1 - 0 W
43%
New York H
4 - 1 W
51%
Philadelphia H
1 - 2 L
40%
New England A
0 - 3 L
66%
Cincinnati A
3 - 4 L
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Toronto H
2 - 1 W
44%
Montréal A
2 - 0 W
50%
DC United A
3 - 1 W
51%
New York H
1 - 3 L
51%
Cincinnati H
2 - 3 L
53%
Sporting KC H
5 - 0 W
31%
Cincinnati A
3 - 3 D
58%
Atlanta United H
1 - 0 W
40%
Nashville H
1 - 0 W
67%
Philadelphia A
2 - 1 W
45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.3 vs 51.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Chicago holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus Montréal's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Chicago is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Montréal leaks 2.1 per match.

Montréal has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chicago has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chicago is a strong road team with a 75% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Chicago emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.8 vs 42.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

In their recent Major League Soccer match (2026-05-16), Chicago prevailed 0-2 against Montréal. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Chicago achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Montréal shows genuine quality and mental strength. Montréal will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chicago will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Montréal

Montréal

VS
Chicago

Chicago

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Montréal

3W 2D 5L · 18 goals scored · 21 conceded

Chicago

7W 1D 2L · 22 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or