NEOM vs Fayha Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare NEOM vs Fayha: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
NEOM
Home Team
Fayha
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
NEOM
Draw
Fayha
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
1W, 3D, 6L
12 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
-2
-13
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 7 matches
0W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 54.4
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15
Actual: 0.7 | Diff: +0.06
Attack: 35.0, Defense: 46.7, Form: 26.3
Attack: 24.0, Defense: 34.3, Form: 10.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
NEOM
Fayha
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Context matters here: Fayha's schedule strength (SoS: 53.0) has been notably more demanding than NEOM's (SoS: 37.6), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
NEOM holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Fayha's 0.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
NEOM's backline outperforms Fayha's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
Fayha has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Fayha is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, NEOM faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Fayha can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for NEOM. In practical terms, NEOM would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
NEOM has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Saudi Arabian League match (2026-04-04), NEOM prevailed 1-0 against Fayha. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. NEOM secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Fayha will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. NEOM will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
NEOM
Fayha
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
NEOM
3W 4D 3L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
Fayha
1W 3D 6L · 7 goals scored · 20 conceded
Popular Teams