Skip to content
Compare New England vs Montréal

New England vs Montréal Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare New England vs Montréal: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

New England New England Home Team
Montréal Montréal Away Team
New England
45.5
D W L L D W D L W L

Last 10 Matches

Montréal
36.8
D W D D L L D D L D

Performance Radar

New England
Montréal

Categories Won

9

New England

3

Draw

3

Montréal

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

10%

1W, 6D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Turgeman (3 goals)
P. Owusu (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.0

40.0

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.09

1.16

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
45.5

Attack: 45.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 31.1

36.8

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 42.0, Form: 9.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

4
New England
Montréal
New England

Power Rating Breakdown

45.5

Overall

Attack 45.0
Defense 58.8
Form 31.1
Consistency 53.2
Montréal

Power Rating Breakdown

36.8

Overall

Attack 39.0
Defense 42.0
Form 9.0
Consistency 79.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

53.0 vs 51.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
New England logo New England
D
NYCFC (54%)
W
DC United (48%)
L
Toronto (49%)
L
Houston (65%)
D
Montréal (50%)
W
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Toronto (44%)
L
Charlotte (64%)
Montréal logo Montréal
D
Galaxy (44%)
W
Columbus (45%)
D
DC United (44%)
D
New England (48%)
L
Inter Miami (60%)
L
Nashville (72%)
D
Toronto (44%)
D
DC United (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NYCFC H
1 - 1 D
54%
DC United A
3 - 0 W
48%
Toronto A
1 - 2 L
49%
Houston H
0 - 2 L
65%
Montréal A
2 - 2 D
50%
Atlanta United H
4 - 1 W
44%
Toronto H
0 - 0 D
44%
Charlotte A
0 - 1 L
64%
Minnesota H
2 - 1 W
45%
Nashville H
0 - 3 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Galaxy H
2 - 2 D
44%
Columbus A
2 - 1 W
45%
DC United H
1 - 1 D
44%
New England H
2 - 2 D
48%
Inter Miami H
0 - 1 L
60%
Nashville A
0 - 1 L
72%
Toronto H
0 - 0 D
44%
DC United A
4 - 4 D
48%
Chicago H
0 - 2 L
56%
Portland H
2 - 2 D
53%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

New England has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 53.8 against considerably stronger competition than Montréal (SoS: 40.0). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

The attacking output of New England and Montréal is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.3 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, New England holds the advantage — allowing just 1.3 goals per game against Montréal's 1.6.

New England has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Montréal is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for New England. In practical terms, New England would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While New England holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.7-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Major League Soccer (2026-08-02). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

New England

New England

VS
Montréal

Montréal

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

New England

3W 3D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Montréal

1W 6D 3L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or