NYCFC vs Inter Miami Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare NYCFC vs Inter Miami: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
NYCFC
Home Team
Inter Miami
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
NYCFC
Draw
Inter Miami
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
6W, 2D, 2L
16 / 10 matches
27 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+4
+6
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.1
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.4
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.35
Attack: 48.5, Defense: 54.5, Form: 36.4
Attack: 81.6, Defense: 27.2, Form: 54.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
NYCFC
Inter Miami
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.9 vs 40.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Inter Miami's attack is on another level, averaging 2.7 goals per match with L. Suárez leading the charge (8 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Defensively, NYCFC is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Inter Miami leaks 2.1 goals per match.
Inter Miami is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: NYCFC has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: Inter Miami has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Inter Miami faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If NYCFC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Inter Miami. In practical terms, Inter Miami would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Inter Miami, with a 8.7-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
NYCFC
Inter Miami
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
NYCFC
4W 3D 3L · 16 goals scored · 12 conceded
Inter Miami
6W 2D 2L · 27 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams