Skip to content
Compare New York vs Cincinnati

New York vs Cincinnati Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare New York vs Cincinnati: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

New York New York Home Team
Cincinnati Cincinnati Away Team
New York
47.0
D L L W L L W D W W

Last 10 Matches

Cincinnati
55.2
D W D W L W W D L D

Performance Radar

New York
Cincinnati

Categories Won

3

New York

4

Draw

8

Cincinnati

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Ruvalcaba (4 goals)
Evander (8 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 14 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.7

52.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.1

2.54

Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
47.0

Attack: 52.1, Defense: 48.6, Form: 41.7

55.2

Attack: 92.0, Defense: 27.3, Form: 40.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
5

31-45'

6
3

46-60'

6

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

7
New York
Cincinnati
New York

Power Rating Breakdown

47.0

Overall

Attack 52.1
Defense 48.6
Form 41.7
Consistency 44.8
Cincinnati

Power Rating Breakdown

55.2

Overall

Attack 92.0
Defense 27.3
Form 40.9
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

53.7 vs 50.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
New York logo New York
D
Chicago (56%)
L
Nashville (67%)
L
Atlanta United (49%)
W
Orlando (49%)
L
Charlotte (58%)
L
Philadelphia (57%)
W
Sporting KC (46%)
D
NYCFC (54%)
Cincinnati logo Cincinnati
D
Sounders (31%)
W
NYCFC (54%)
D
Orlando (54%)
W
Earthquakes (33%)
L
Columbus (45%)
W
Whitecaps (55%)
W
Orlando (49%)
D
San Diego (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chicago H
1 - 1 D
56%
Nashville H
0 - 1 L
67%
Atlanta United A
1 - 2 L
49%
Orlando H
3 - 2 W
49%
Charlotte H
0 - 2 L
58%
Philadelphia A
1 - 3 L
57%
Sporting KC A
2 - 1 W
46%
NYCFC H
1 - 1 D
54%
Columbus H
3 - 2 W
40%
Chicago A
3 - 1 W
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sounders H
1 - 1 D
31%
NYCFC H
2 - 1 W
54%
Orlando A
1 - 1 D
54%
Earthquakes H
4 - 2 W
33%
Columbus A
1 - 2 L
45%
Whitecaps H
4 - 3 W
55%
Orlando H
6 - 2 W
49%
San Diego A
3 - 3 D
59%
Inter Miami H
3 - 5 L
60%
Charlotte A
2 - 2 D
64%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (54.2 vs 52.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match Cincinnati in front of goal. Their 2.7 average per fixture tells the story, with Evander driving that output personally responsible for 8 goals this campaign.

Defensively, New York holds the advantage — allowing just 1.6 goals per game against Cincinnati's 2.2.

New York has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cincinnati has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Cincinnati has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cincinnati faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.2 goals per match. If New York can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Cincinnati. In practical terms, Cincinnati would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Cincinnati holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

New York

New York

VS
Cincinnati

Cincinnati

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

New York

4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 16 conceded

Cincinnati

4W 4D 2L · 27 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or