N. Macedonia vs Kazakhstan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare N. Macedonia vs Kazakhstan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
N. Macedonia
Home Team
Kazakhstan
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
N. Macedonia
Draw
Kazakhstan
Statistical Comparison
1W, 5D, 4L
3W, 3D, 4L
8 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-10
-3
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 3 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 7 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 65.2
League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 62.0
0W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.05
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.21
Attack: 28.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 10.6
Attack: 38.4, Defense: 55.8, Form: 31.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
N. Macedonia
Kazakhstan
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (55.8 vs 54.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Offensively, Kazakhstan outperforms N. Macedonia with 1.1 goals per match to 0.8, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Defensively, Kazakhstan holds the advantage — allowing just 1.4 goals per game against N. Macedonia's 1.8.
N. Macedonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Kazakhstan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: N. Macedonia is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Kazakhstan faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If N. Macedonia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Kazakhstan. In practical terms, Kazakhstan would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Kazakhstan holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.1-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-10-13). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
N. Macedonia
Kazakhstan
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
N. Macedonia
1W 5D 4L · 8 goals scored · 18 conceded
Kazakhstan
3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams