Skip to content
Compare N. Macedonia vs Liechtenstein

N. Macedonia vs Liechtenstein Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare N. Macedonia vs Liechtenstein: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

N. Macedonia N. Macedonia Home Team
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein Away Team
N. Macedonia
33.8
L D D L L D D D W L

Last 10 Matches

Liechtenstein
17.7
L L L W L L L L L L

Performance Radar

N. Macedonia
Liechtenstein

Categories Won

10

N. Macedonia

3

Draw

2

Liechtenstein

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

10%

1W, 0D, 9L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.3

3 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

3.3

33 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

-30

-30

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Bardhi (2 goals)
F. Sağlam (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 7 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.8

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 65.2

55.2

League Difficulty: 82.5, Opponent Quality: 63.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.05

0.25

Actual: 0.3 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
33.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 10.6

17.7

Attack: 10.5, Defense: 0.0, Form: 10.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

N. Macedonia
Liechtenstein
N. Macedonia

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 42.3
Form 10.6
Consistency 77.2
Liechtenstein

Power Rating Breakdown

17.7

Overall

Attack 10.5
Defense 0.0
Form 10.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.5 vs 82.5

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 63.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
N. Macedonia logo N. Macedonia
L
Turkey (78%)
D
Bosnia (64%)
D
Rep. Ireland (74%)
L
Denmark (81%)
L
Wales (66%)
D
Latvia (53%)
D
Kazakhstan (58%)
D
Belgium (84%)
Liechtenstein logo Liechtenstein
L
Cyprus (58%)
L
Andorra (50%)
L
Aruba (71%)
W
Tanzania (53%)
L
Belgium (84%)
L
Wales (60%)
L
Montenegro (59%)
L
Kazakhstan (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Turkey A
0 - 4 L
78%
Bosnia A
0 - 0 D
64%
Rep. Ireland A
0 - 0 D
74%
Denmark A
0 - 4 L
81%
Wales A
1 - 7 L
66%
Latvia H
0 - 0 D
53%
Kazakhstan H
1 - 1 D
58%
Belgium A
0 - 0 D
84%
Liechtenstein H
5 - 0 W
38%
Saudi Arabia A
1 - 2 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cyprus H
0 - 2 L
58%
Andorra A
0 - 2 L
50%
Aruba A
1 - 4 L
71%
Tanzania A
1 - 0 W
53%
Belgium A
0 - 7 L
84%
Wales H
0 - 1 L
60%
Montenegro A
1 - 2 L
59%
Kazakhstan A
0 - 4 L
64%
N. Macedonia A
0 - 5 L
57%
Belgium H
0 - 6 L
79%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (55.8 vs 55.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, N. Macedonia outperforms Liechtenstein with 0.8 goals per match to 0.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Defensively, N. Macedonia is far superior, conceding just 1.8 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Liechtenstein leaks 3.3 goals per match.

N. Macedonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Liechtenstein has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

❄️ Form Momentum: N. Macedonia is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Liechtenstein is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, N. Macedonia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Liechtenstein can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 16.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for N. Macedonia. In practical terms, N. Macedonia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

N. Macedonia emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (33.8 vs 17.7) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-09-07): N. Macedonia defeated Liechtenstein 5-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates N. Macedonia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Liechtenstein. N. Macedonia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-0 scoreline was emphatic — N. Macedonia completely dominated Liechtenstein in that encounter, raising serious questions about Liechtenstein's ability to compete at this level. Liechtenstein will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. N. Macedonia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

N. Macedonia

N. Macedonia

VS
Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

N. Macedonia

1W 5D 4L · 8 goals scored · 18 conceded

Liechtenstein

1W 0D 9L · 3 goals scored · 33 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or