Norway vs New Zealand Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Norway vs New Zealand: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Norway
Home Team
New Zealand
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Norway
Draw
New Zealand
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
1W, 2D, 7L
18 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
23 / 10 matches
+3
-13
1 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2
League Difficulty: 81.5, Opponent Quality: 68.9
2W / 6 matches
0W / 6 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.57
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.32
Attack: 69.8, Defense: 58.2, Form: 58.2
Attack: 35.6, Defense: 24.9, Form: 10.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Norway
New Zealand
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 66.4 vs 56.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, Norway outperforms New Zealand with 1.8 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Defensively, Norway holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against New Zealand's 2.3.
Norway has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
New Zealand has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Norway is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Norway has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: New Zealand is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Norway is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while New Zealand shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Norway faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If New Zealand can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 28.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Norway. In practical terms, Norway would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Norway holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 59.8 against 31.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals (2025-10-14). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Norway
New Zealand
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Norway
5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
New Zealand
1W 2D 7L · 10 goals scored · 23 conceded
Popular Teams