Skip to content
Compare Forest vs Bristol City

Forest vs Bristol City Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Forest vs Bristol City: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Forest Forest Home Team
Bristol City Bristol City Away Team
Forest
35.7
L W D W W L D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Bristol City
41.7
W W D L W D L L L W

Performance Radar

Forest
Bristol City

Categories Won

1

Forest

6

Draw

8

Bristol City

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Omewa (3 goals)
L. Lloyd-Smith (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

34.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.77

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.13

1.44

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
35.7

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8

41.7

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

5
Forest
Bristol City
Forest

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 25.3
Defense 45.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 44.8
Bristol City

Power Rating Breakdown

41.7

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 45.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

47.1 vs 47.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Forest logo Forest
L
Southampton (53%)
W
Portsmouth (31%)
D
Newcastle (54%)
W
Durham (43%)
W
Ipswich (52%)
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
D
Sunderland (43%)
L
Charlton (38%)
Bristol City logo Bristol City
W
Sheff Utd (34%)
W
Newcastle (49%)
D
Durham (48%)
L
Birmingham (52%)
W
Charlton (38%)
D
Portsmouth (31%)
L
Arsenal (62%)
L
Southampton (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Southampton H
0 - 3 L
53%
Portsmouth A
1 - 0 W
31%
Newcastle A
1 - 1 D
54%
Durham H
2 - 1 W
43%
Ipswich H
2 - 0 W
52%
Crystal Palace A
0 - 1 L
70%
Sunderland A
1 - 1 D
43%
Charlton H
0 - 2 L
38%
Birmingham A
1 - 5 L
57%
Sheff Utd H
1 - 0 W
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sheff Utd A
4 - 0 W
34%
Newcastle H
2 - 1 W
49%
Durham A
2 - 2 D
48%
Birmingham H
0 - 1 L
52%
Charlton H
2 - 1 W
38%
Portsmouth A
2 - 2 D
31%
Arsenal A
0 - 3 L
62%
Southampton H
0 - 2 L
53%
Crystal Palace A
1 - 2 L
70%
Sunderland H
3 - 0 W
38%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (34.5 vs 34.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Bristol City leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Forest's 0.9 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Forest conceding 1.4 and Bristol City conceding 1.4 per match.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bristol City faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Forest can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Bristol City. In practical terms, Bristol City would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Bristol City, with a 6.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Forest

Forest

VS
Bristol City

Bristol City

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Forest

4W 2D 4L · 9 goals scored · 14 conceded

Bristol City

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or