Skip to content
Compare Notts Co vs Grimsby

Notts Co vs Grimsby Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Notts Co vs Grimsby: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Notts Co Notts Co Home Team
Grimsby Grimsby Away Team
Notts Co
42.0
D D D D L L W D W D

Last 10 Matches

Grimsby
52.1
D W L L W D W W D D

Performance Radar

Notts Co
Grimsby

Categories Won

2

Notts Co

5

Draw

8

Grimsby

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 6D, 2L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Roberts (2 goals)
H. Rodgers (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 16
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.0

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 48.0

45.5

League Difficulty: 43.5, Opponent Quality: 46.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.98

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.02

1.49

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
42.0

Attack: 32.0, Defense: 64.0, Form: 19.2

52.1

Attack: 54.1, Defense: 63.7, Form: 38.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Notts Co
Grimsby
Notts Co

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 32.0
Defense 64.0
Form 19.2
Consistency 71.2
Grimsby

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 54.1
Defense 63.7
Form 38.2
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.0 vs 43.5

Opponent Quality

48.0 vs 46.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Notts Co logo Notts Co
D
Luton (64%)
D
Leicester (46%)
D
Burnley (38%)
D
Walsall (43%)
L
N Forest (51%)
L
Randers (46%)
W
Salford (46%)
D
Chesterfield (44%)
Grimsby logo Grimsby
D
Walsall (41%)
W
Exeter (38%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
L
Grimsby Bor. (46%)
W
Wigan (36%)
D
Boston (59%)
W
Lincoln (43%)
W
Hartlepool (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Luton A
2 - 2 D
64%
Leicester H
1 - 1 D
46%
Burnley A
1 - 1 D
38%
Walsall A
0 - 0 D
43%
N Forest H
0 - 2 L
51%
Randers A
1 - 3 L
46%
Salford H
3 - 0 W
46%
Chesterfield H
0 - 0 D
44%
Chesterfield A
1 - 0 W
49%
Bristol R H
1 - 1 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Walsall A
0 - 0 D
41%
Exeter H
1 - 0 W
38%
Blackpool H
1 - 3 L
52%
Grimsby Bor. A
2 - 3 L
46%
Wigan H
2 - 0 W
36%
Boston A
0 - 0 D
59%
Lincoln H
5 - 1 W
43%
Hartlepool A
3 - 0 W
50%
Zorya A
1 - 1 D
53%
Salford A
2 - 2 D
51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.0 vs 45.5), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Grimsby leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Notts Co's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Notts Co conceding 1.0 and Grimsby conceding 1.0 per match.

Notts Co has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Grimsby has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Grimsby has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Notts Co is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Grimsby has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Grimsby faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Notts Co can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Grimsby. In practical terms, Grimsby would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Grimsby, with a 10.1-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Notts Co

Notts Co

VS
Grimsby

Grimsby

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Notts Co

2W 6D 2L · 10 goals scored · 10 conceded

Grimsby

4W 4D 2L · 17 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or