Omonia vs Kairat Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Omonia vs Kairat: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Omonia
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Omonia
Draw
Kairat
Statistical Comparison
3W, 0D, 3L
2W, 0D, 3L
5 / 6 matches
7 / 5 matches
6 / 6 matches
9 / 5 matches
-1
-2
2 / 6 matches
1 / 5 matches
2 / 6 matches
3 / 5 matches
2 / 6 matches
3 / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 2 matches
1W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 75.7, Opponent Quality: 65.2
League Difficulty: 97.0, Opponent Quality: 82.2
1W / 3 matches
2W / 5 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.29
Attack: 29.7, Defense: 74.3, Form: 55.7
Attack: 59.5, Defense: 51.0, Form: 51.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Omonia
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Kairat has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 77.6) compared to Omonia (SoS: 61.4). This means Kairat's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Kairat leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.4 goals per game compared to Omonia's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Omonia holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.0 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Kairat's leaky backline that surrenders 1.8 goals per match.
Omonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Kairat has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.5 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Kairat is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Kairat's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-22): Omonia defeated Kairat 1-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Omonia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Kairat. Omonia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Kairat will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Omonia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Omonia
Kairat
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Omonia
3W 0D 3L · 5 goals scored · 6 conceded
Kairat
2W 0D 3L · 7 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams