Skip to content
Compare Pafos vs Chelsea

Pafos vs Chelsea Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Pafos vs Chelsea: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Pafos Pafos Home Team
Chelsea Chelsea Away Team
Pafos
41.1
L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Chelsea
45.1
L W L D L W L L L W

Performance Radar

Pafos
Chelsea

Categories Won

4

Pafos

3

Draw

8

Chelsea

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

1W, 0D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

6 / 5 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

9 / 5 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 5 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

2 / 5 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

2 / 5 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Dragomir (1 goals)
E. Fernández (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
100%

1W / 1 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.3

League Difficulty: 84.2, Opponent Quality: 69.6

60.7

League Difficulty: 82.1, Opponent Quality: 69.5

Elite Opponent Record
33%

1W / 3 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.6

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.4

1.22

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
41.1

Attack: 46.5, Defense: 46.5, Form: 23.3

45.1

Attack: 48.0, Defense: 55.4, Form: 33.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

3
Pafos
Chelsea
Pafos

Power Rating Breakdown

41.1

Overall

Attack 46.5
Defense 46.5
Form 23.3
Consistency 56.8
Chelsea

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 48.0
Defense 55.4
Form 33.2
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

84.2 vs 82.1

Opponent Quality

69.6 vs 69.5

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 14%
Pafos logo Pafos
L
Hajduk (71%)
L
Slovan (52%)
W
Slavia Prague (79%)
L
Chelsea (65%)
L
Juventus (81%)
Chelsea logo Chelsea
L
Sunderland (76%)
W
Spurs (71%)
L
Man City (62%)
D
Liverpool (72%)
L
Forest (76%)
W
Leeds (48%)
L
Brighton (75%)
L
Man Utd (79%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hajduk A
0 - 2 L
71%
Slovan A
2 - 3 L
52%
Slavia Prague H
4 - 1 W
79%
Chelsea A
0 - 1 L
65%
Juventus A
0 - 2 L
81%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sunderland A
1 - 2 L
76%
Spurs H
2 - 1 W
71%
Man City H
0 - 1 L
62%
Liverpool A
1 - 1 D
72%
Forest H
1 - 3 L
76%
Leeds H
1 - 0 W
48%
Brighton A
0 - 3 L
75%
Man Utd H
0 - 1 L
79%
Man City H
0 - 3 L
83%
Port Vale H
7 - 0 W
53%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 66.3 vs 60.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Pafos (1.2 goals per match) and Chelsea (1.3 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Defensively, Chelsea holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Pafos's 1.8.

Pafos has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Chelsea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Pafos has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Pafos is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelsea faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Pafos can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Pafos's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-01-21): Chelsea defeated Pafos 1-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Chelsea's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Pafos. Chelsea secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Pafos will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chelsea will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Pafos

Pafos

VS
Chelsea

Chelsea

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Pafos

1W 0D 4L · 6 goals scored · 9 conceded

Chelsea

3W 1D 6L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or