Pafos vs Hajduk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Pafos vs Hajduk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Pafos
Home Team
Hajduk
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Pafos
Draw
Hajduk
Statistical Comparison
1W, 0D, 4L
4W, 3D, 3L
6 / 5 matches
17 / 10 matches
9 / 5 matches
12 / 10 matches
-3
+5
0 / 5 matches
3 / 10 matches
2 / 5 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 5 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 1 matches
4W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 84.2, Opponent Quality: 69.6
League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 58.6
1W / 3 matches
1W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.4
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 46.5, Defense: 46.5, Form: 23.3
Attack: 60.0, Defense: 63.5, Form: 42.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Pafos
Hajduk
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Pafos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.3) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 55.8). This means Pafos's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Hajduk holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Pafos's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, Hajduk holds the advantage — allowing just 1.2 goals per game against Pafos's 1.8.
Pafos has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Pafos has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Pafos is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Hajduk has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Hajduk is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Pafos shows signs of decline with 1W in last 5.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Hajduk faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Pafos can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for Hajduk. In practical terms, Hajduk would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Hajduk holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 13.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent UEFA Europa League encounter (2026-07-23), Hajduk came out on top with a 2-0 victory over Pafos. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Hajduk secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Pafos will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hajduk will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Pafos
Hajduk
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Pafos
1W 0D 4L · 6 goals scored · 9 conceded
Hajduk
4W 3D 3L · 17 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams