Skip to content
Compare Partick vs Morton

Partick vs Morton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Partick vs Morton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Partick Partick Home Team
Morton Morton Away Team
Partick
52.1
D D D W W L D W D D

Last 10 Matches

Morton
29.1
L L L L D L D L L W

Performance Radar

Partick
Morton

Categories Won

11

Partick

3

Draw

1

Morton

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 6D, 1L

10%

1W, 2D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+10

+10

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Samuel (3 goals)
C. Main (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.6

League Difficulty: 54.7, Opponent Quality: 56.4

48.5

League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 52.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.05

0.46

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
52.1

Attack: 61.1, Defense: 61.1, Form: 27.5

29.1

Attack: 19.7, Defense: 36.1, Form: 9.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

5

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

Partick
Morton
Partick

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 61.1
Defense 61.1
Form 27.5
Consistency 68.5
Morton

Power Rating Breakdown

29.1

Overall

Attack 19.7
Defense 36.1
Form 9.8
Consistency 74.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.7 vs 43.2

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 52.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Partick logo Partick
D
Clydebank (73%)
D
Stenhousemuir (51%)
D
Livingston (53%)
W
Forfar (49%)
W
Brechin (36%)
L
St. Mirren (68%)
D
St. Mirren (63%)
W
Dunfermline (60%)
Morton logo Morton
L
Inverness (57%)
L
St. Johnstone (69%)
L
East Fife (54%)
L
Linlithgow (52%)
D
Airdrieonians (37%)
L
Ross County (56%)
D
Queen's Park (47%)
L
Raith Rovers (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clydebank A
2 - 2 D
73%
Stenhousemuir H
2 - 2 D
51%
Livingston A
1 - 1 D
53%
Forfar A
4 - 0 W
49%
Brechin H
6 - 0 W
36%
St. Mirren A
0 - 1 L
68%
St. Mirren H
1 - 1 D
63%
Dunfermline H
2 - 1 W
60%
Dunfermline A
1 - 1 D
64%
Queen's Park H
1 - 1 D
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inverness H
0 - 1 L
57%
St. Johnstone A
0 - 3 L
69%
East Fife A
0 - 2 L
54%
Linlithgow H
0 - 1 L
52%
Airdrieonians H
1 - 1 D
37%
Ross County A
0 - 4 L
56%
Queen's Park H
0 - 0 D
47%
Raith Rovers A
2 - 3 L
54%
Dunfermline A
1 - 3 L
53%
Arbroath H
2 - 1 W
41%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 41.6 vs 48.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Few sides can match Partick in front of goal. Their 2.0 average per fixture tells the story, with A. Samuel driving that output personally responsible for 3 goals this campaign.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Partick — 1.0 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Morton, who give up 1.9 goals per match at the other end.

Morton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Morton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Partick. In practical terms, Partick would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Partick emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.1 vs 29.1) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Partick

Partick

VS
Morton

Morton

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Partick

3W 6D 1L · 20 goals scored · 10 conceded

Morton

1W 2D 7L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or