Skip to content
Compare Partick vs Rangers

Partick vs Rangers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Partick vs Rangers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Partick Partick Home Team
Rangers Rangers Away Team
Partick
26.7
L D D L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Rangers
64.5
W W L W L L W W W W

Performance Radar

Partick
Rangers

Categories Won

1

Partick

2

Draw

12

Rangers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 3D, 7L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

+13

+13

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Townsley (1 goals)
K. Wilkinson (8 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 57.1

45.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.49

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.11

2.32

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
26.7

Attack: 17.6, Defense: 29.3, Form: 0.0

64.5

Attack: 76.3, Defense: 60.4, Form: 66.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

4

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

7
Partick
Rangers
Partick

Power Rating Breakdown

26.7

Overall

Attack 17.6
Defense 29.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7
Rangers

Power Rating Breakdown

64.5

Overall

Attack 76.3
Defense 60.4
Form 66.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Partick logo Partick
L
Hibernian (66%)
D
Spartans (40%)
D
Celtic (49%)
L
Hibernian (66%)
L
Rangers (59%)
L
Hearts (67%)
L
Glasgow City (45%)
D
Hibernian (71%)
Rangers logo Rangers
W
Spartans (39%)
W
Montrose (46%)
L
Ajax (51%)
W
Slavia Prague (44%)
L
Celtic (44%)
L
Glasgow City (50%)
W
Celtic (44%)
W
Partick (32%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hibernian H
1 - 3 L
66%
Spartans A
1 - 1 D
40%
Celtic A
1 - 1 D
49%
Hibernian H
1 - 3 L
66%
Rangers H
0 - 3 L
59%
Hearts A
0 - 3 L
67%
Glasgow City H
0 - 2 L
45%
Hibernian A
0 - 0 D
71%
Rangers A
0 - 1 L
64%
Celtic H
2 - 3 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartans H
7 - 0 W
39%
Montrose A
4 - 1 W
46%
Ajax A
1 - 2 L
51%
Slavia Prague A
2 - 1 W
44%
Celtic H
0 - 1 L
44%
Glasgow City A
0 - 6 L
50%
Celtic H
4 - 0 W
44%
Partick A
3 - 0 W
32%
Montrose H
2 - 0 W
41%
Hibernian H
1 - 0 W
66%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 38.0 vs 45.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Rangers possess a formidable attacking unit, with K. Wilkinson accounting for 8 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.4 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Rangers holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.1 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Partick's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

Rangers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Rangers has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Rangers is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Partick is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

🔥 Form Momentum: Rangers is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 24 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Rangers is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Partick shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 37.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Rangers. In practical terms, Rangers would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Rangers is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 64.5 vs 26.7, and superior metrics across the board, Rangers should win this comfortably.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Scottish SWPL 1 match (2026-05-10), Rangers prevailed 0-3 against Partick. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Rangers achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Partick shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-3 scoreline was emphatic — Rangers completely dominated Partick in that encounter, raising serious questions about Partick's ability to compete at this level. Partick will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Rangers will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent Scottish SWPL 1 match (2026-04-01), Rangers prevailed 1-0 against Partick. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Rangers secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Partick will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Rangers will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Partick

Partick

VS
Rangers

Rangers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Partick

0W 3D 7L · 6 goals scored · 20 conceded

Rangers

7W 0D 3L · 24 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or