Skip to content
Compare Partick vs Spartans

Partick vs Spartans Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Partick vs Spartans: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Partick Partick Home Team
Spartans Spartans Away Team
Partick
26.7
L D D L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Spartans
17.0
L D L

Performance Radar

Partick
Spartans

Categories Won

6

Partick

6

Draw

3

Spartans

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 3D, 7L

0%

0W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

0.3

1 / 3 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

4.0

12 / 3 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 3 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

67%

2 / 3 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

33%

1 / 3 matches

Top Scorer
S. Townsley (1 goals)
T. Hollis (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 1
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 57.1

48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.49

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.11

0.29

Actual: 0.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
26.7

Attack: 17.6, Defense: 29.3, Form: 0.0

17.0

Attack: 9.8, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
Partick
Spartans
Partick

Power Rating Breakdown

26.7

Overall

Attack 17.6
Defense 29.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7
Spartans

Power Rating Breakdown

17.0

Overall

Attack 9.8
Defense 0.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Partick logo Partick
L
Hibernian (66%)
D
Spartans (40%)
D
Celtic (49%)
L
Hibernian (66%)
L
Rangers (59%)
L
Hearts (67%)
L
Glasgow City (45%)
D
Hibernian (71%)
Spartans logo Spartans
L
Rangers (64%)
D
Partick (26%)
L
Hearts (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hibernian H
1 - 3 L
66%
Spartans A
1 - 1 D
40%
Celtic A
1 - 1 D
49%
Hibernian H
1 - 3 L
66%
Rangers H
0 - 3 L
59%
Hearts A
0 - 3 L
67%
Glasgow City H
0 - 2 L
45%
Hibernian A
0 - 0 D
71%
Rangers A
0 - 1 L
64%
Celtic H
2 - 3 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rangers A
0 - 7 L
64%
Partick H
1 - 1 D
26%
Hearts H
0 - 4 L
62%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Context matters here: Spartans's schedule strength (SoS: 48.4) has been notably more demanding than Partick's (SoS: 38.0), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Offensively, Partick outperforms Spartans with 0.6 goals per match to 0.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Partick — 2.0 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of Spartans, who give up 4.0 goals per match at the other end.

Spartans has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Partick is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Spartans is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 3 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Partick faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Spartans can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Partick. In practical terms, Partick would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Partick has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.7-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish SWPL 1 (2026-08-16). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Partick

Partick

VS
Spartans

Spartans

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Partick

0W 3D 7L · 6 goals scored · 20 conceded

Spartans

0W 1D 2L · 1 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or